Our approach

People. Evidence. Better decisions.

Gryphon Advisory is built for the hard middle of insider risk: where a signal matters, trust is involved, and a poorly supported conclusion can create more risk than the incident itself.

Standing principle

Evidence over assumptions.

The practice maintains a disciplined separation between what digital evidence shows, what can responsibly be inferred about an individual, and what remains for a legal or employment process to determine. That distinction protects both the organization and the people involved.

A conclusion of non-attribution is not a failure of the process. It is often the most honest and useful outcome the evidence allows.

Calibrated clarity

Three ideas that should never be conflated.

01

Technical identification

What acted: a device, account, session, artifact, or system event.

02

Investigative attribution

Who is most likely responsible after converged evidence and alternative explanations are tested.

03

Legal attribution

A determination reserved for the appropriate adjudicator, tribunal, or authority.

A counsel-friendly approach to a complex risk.

Start with the matter, the facts currently available, and the decision-makers who need to be involved.

Contact Gryphon Advisory